A timid step entirely provisional and unsatisfactory. This is the verdict ANM on the bill the government for the efficiency of the civil trial. For the association
magistrates, the prediction of the completion by the heads of a program for managing the pending civil litigation with an indication of the objectives and priorities is certainly welcomed. Similarly, for the judiciary is to be welcomed the provision for allowing the heads of the courts entering into special agreements with the university faculties of Law, the schools of specialization for the legal profession and the advice of the bar associations for the construction of office court.
arouse considerable doubts, however, the provisions on the grounds at the request of the party and the need to make an application for discussion by mandatory, on pain of extinction of the procedure.
It is expected that will effectively reduce the time resolution of the disputes, it is widely expected that almost all of the interested parties will make both requests and that is still likely to pose only a burden on citizens who await a decision by now many years.
appears, finally, to discuss the introduction of an auxiliary court to define the causes dating back, in the absence of a systematic reform of the judiciary fees, with the risk of introducing an additional, unusual and indefinite professional.
0 comments:
Post a Comment